<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agents on Fernando Correia&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://fernandocorreia.dev/tags/agents/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Agents on Fernando Correia&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Fernando de Alcantara Correia</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fernandocorreia.dev/tags/agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Shifting code review left</title>
      <link>https://fernandocorreia.dev/posts/building-a-code-review-bot/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://fernandocorreia.dev/posts/building-a-code-review-bot/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
            &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;How I built an agent to automate the grunt work of code review so that reviewers can focus more on intent and design.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;1-the-problem-thorough-code-review-is-necessary-but-expensive&#34;&gt;1. The problem: thorough code review is necessary but expensive&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s 2pm. My review queue has about a dozen pull requests in it. My team just finished their day and submitted them before signing
off. A few PRs run to several hundred lines. By the time I work through the queue, the authors are offline. Whatever feedback I
leave won&amp;rsquo;t be read until they log on tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;
          
          
        
      </description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>